"J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2004.10.07, J.A. Magallon wrote:
> > > > This conflicts with kernel/irq/proc.c:
> > > > unsigned long prof_cpu_mask = -1;
> > > > Shouldn't this be:
> > > > cpumask_t prof_cpu_mask = CPU_MASK_NONE;
> > > > This will show problems when NR_CPUS > sizeof(long)....
> > > > Err....
> > There is a problem with this -mm:
Yes, there seems to be a mingo/wli bunfight over prof_cpu_mask.
Something like this, I think:
Attachment:
10-irq-cpumask.bz2
Description: application/bzip
Attachment:
11-opt-profile.bz2
Description: application/bzip
Attachment:
15-uhci-pci.bz2
Description: application/bzip
Attachment:
20-e100-irq.bz2
Description: application/bzip
Attachment:
30-1Gb-lowmem.bz2
Description: application/bzip