[PATCH] check copy_to_user return value in raw1394
From: Jesper Juhl
Date: Sat Oct 09 2004 - 19:06:34 EST
Here's a proposed patch to make sure we check the return value of
copy_to_user in raw1394.c::raw1394_read
I've changed __copy_to_user into copy_to_user since I don't see where we
would otherwhise be doing the access_ok checking...
Please review this patch before applying.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@xxxxxx>
diff -up linux-2.6.9-rc3-bk9-orig/drivers/ieee1394/raw1394.c linux-2.6.9-rc3-bk9/drivers/ieee1394/raw1394.c
--- linux-2.6.9-rc3-bk9-orig/drivers/ieee1394/raw1394.c 2004-09-30 05:03:45.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.9-rc3-bk9/drivers/ieee1394/raw1394.c 2004-10-10 02:05:54.000000000 +0200
@@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ static ssize_t raw1394_read(struct file
struct file_info *fi = (struct file_info *)file->private_data;
struct list_head *lh;
struct pending_request *req;
+ ssize_t ret;
if (count != sizeof(struct raw1394_request)) {
return -EINVAL;
@@ -443,10 +444,15 @@ static ssize_t raw1394_read(struct file
req->req.error = RAW1394_ERROR_MEMFAULT;
}
}
- __copy_to_user(buffer, &req->req, sizeof(req->req));
+ if(copy_to_user(buffer, &req->req, sizeof(req->req))) {
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ ret = (ssize_t)sizeof(struct raw1394_request);
+out:
free_pending_request(req);
- return sizeof(struct raw1394_request);
+ return ret;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/