Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memoryplacement

From: Paul Jackson
Date: Sat Oct 09 2004 - 19:10:10 EST


Matthew writes:
> > CKRM aspires to be both a general purpose resource management framework
> > and the embodiment of fair share scheduling.
>
> I think your missing something here. CKRM, as I understand it, aspires
> to be a general purpose resource management framework. To that point I
> will accede. But the second part, about CKRM being the embodiment of
> fair share scheduling, is secondary.

Ok - you may well be right that CKRM does not aspire to be the embodiment
of fair share scheduling. But doesn't it embody a fair share sheduler
(and no other such policy) as a matter of current implementation fact?

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/