Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Performance of del_single_shot_timer_sync

[shobhit dayal]

On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 22:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> shobhit dayal <shobhit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > del_timer_sync was responsible for about 2% of all remote memory
> > accesses on the system and came up as part of the top 10 functions who
> > were doing this. On top was schedule(7.52%) followed by
> > default_wake_function(2.79%). Rest every one in the top 10 were
> > around the range of 2%.
> > 
> > After the patch it never came up in the logs again( so less than 0.5% of
> > all faulting eip's).
> > 
> 
> And what is the overall improvement from the del_timer_sync speedup patch? 
> I mean: overall runtime and CPU time improvements for a
> relatively-real-world benchmark?
> 

I have Geoff's figures 

Before:             32p     4p
     Warm cache   29,000    505
     Cold cache   37,800   1220

After:              32p     4p
     Warm cache       95     88
     Cold cache    1,800    140
[Measurements are CPU cycles spent in a call to del_timer_sync, the average
of 1000 calls. 32p is 16-node NUMA, 4p is SMP.]

These figures, would apply for the case for where del_timer_sync does get called from del_single_shot_timer_sync.
That is del_singe_shot_timer_sync gets called after timer has expired

For my profiling workload i used the standard pg_regress module from the postgres installation and noticed that
the ratio of calls to del_single_shot_timer_sync after expiry to before expiry was 10:1. over 11000 calls to
del_single_shot_timer_sync.

regards
shobhit

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/