Re: udev: what's up with old /dev ?

[Hacksaw]

>> If the initrd gets corrupted, are we just hosed?
>
>In some way, the answer is yes... I think the best is having a real, 
>on-disk, full "/dev" hierarchy in case the INITRD gets lost or 
>corrupted, which will still allow booting. Now, the INITRD can mount 
>tmpfs over "/dev" and use udev to create needed device nodes.

And see, this is where I say, what if /dev is hosed too? If the kernel at this 
point gives up, then the user has to dig up a boot CD or something worse and 
start trying to fix the system.

If, however, the kernel just made /dev/console and maybe /dev/null, it could 
start a shell and say "/dev missing /console device, initrd corrupted. Hit 
enter for a shell or ctrl-alt-del to reboot."

As a sys-admin, I'd like that. Get me into single user mode the best you can. 
If a shell can be found, that's good enough.
-- 
The best is the enemy of the good  -- Voltaire
The Good Enough is the enemy of the Great -- Me
http://www.hacksaw.org -- http://www.privatecircus.com -- KB1FVD


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/