Re: NUMA: Patch for node based swapping

[Rik van Riel]

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> Any other suggestions?

Since this is meant as a stop gap patch, waiting for a real
solution, and is only relevant for big (and rare) systems,
it would be an idea to at least leave it off by default.

I think it would be safe to assume that a $100k system has
a system administrator looking after it, while a $5k AMD64
whitebox might not have somebody watching its performance.

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/