Re: Fw: signed kernel modules?

[David Howells]

> 
> I agree.  We have to be able to detect improper header information for
> unsigned modules today, nothing new there.  So by only signing the
> information that the kernel looks at, we should be fine.

I'm writing an ELF checker to go with my module signature checker. I'll put it
up for approval, flames, etc.. in a bit. As soon as I can persuade gdb that,
yes, it _does_ want to debug 64-bit code...

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/