Re: [OOPS] 2.6.9-rc4, dual Opteron, NUMA, 8GB

[Brad Fitzpatrick]

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Brad Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > I was just about to mail and report that disabling NUMA does help:
> >
> >    NUMA + mke2fs on LVM:      OOPS  (mailed earlier)
> > no NUMA + mke2fs on LVM:      okay
> >    NUMA + mke2fs on sdb1:     OOPS  (below)
> > no NUMA + mke2fs on sdb1:     okay
> >
> > no NUMA + mount e2fs on LVM:  okay
> > no NUMA + mount e2fs on sb1:  okay
> >    NUMA + mount e2fs on LVM:  okay
> >    NUMA + mount e2fs on sb1:  untested, assume okay
>
>
> Honestly it smells like a devmapper bug, with the pertinent test case
> being some sort of behavior not normally generated by filesystem use
> (the most common use case for block devices).

Except for the data point above:

NUMA + mke2fs on sdb1:     OOPS  (below)

That's with devmapper totally out of the picture.

- Brad
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/