Re: [PATCH] Weak symbols in modules and versioned symbols

[Rusty Russell]

On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 00:58, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> Hello,
>   is there some reason why to not apply patch below?  Without patch below
> I'm getting
> 
> vmmon: no version for "sys_ioctl" found: kernel tainted.

Sure, patch seems fine to me.  I guess you're the first one to use weak
symbols in a module.  In fact, I think PPC64 might barf on them anyway.

Please ensure you've read Documentation/SubmittingPatches line 262
onwards "11) Sign your work" and resend to me off-line.

Thanks!
Rusty.
-- 
Anyone who quotes me in their signature is an idiot -- Rusty Russell

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/