Re: per-process shared information

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 08:14:46PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> that you can't get those values efficiently. Even assuming you're ok to
> drop shared by disabling SHR, it wouldn't help, without a kernel API
> change.

On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 01:51:56PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
>> Well, as long as it makes the users happy... I don't personally
>> care, except to say that I don't care to document all sorts
>> of kernel-specific variations. It gets hopelessly messy.

On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 08:14:46PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Yep, I believe users could be happy with Hugh's rss-anon_rss variant.

I just checked in with some Oracle people and the primary concern
is splitting up RSS into shared and private. Given either shared
or private the other is calculable.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/