Re: per-process shared information
From: William Lee Irwin III
Date: Fri Oct 15 2004 - 15:42:57 EST
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 11:47:13AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> workloads, rather it's known up-front that no fork()-based COW sharing
>> is going on in Oracle's case, so in this case, "anonymous" very happily
>> corresponds to "process-private". [..]
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 09:23:13PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Ok fine.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 11:47:13AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> [..] In fact, the /proc/ changes to report
>> threads only under the directory hierarchy of some distinguished thread
>> assists in this estimation effort.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 09:23:13PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> do you use threads now?
I believe using threads to some extent has been an option for some time,
though not a commonly used one on Linux.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/