Re: [PATCH] Make netif_rx_ni preempt-safe
From: Lee Revell
Date:  Wed Oct 20 2004 - 15:07:51 EST
On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 15:14, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 October 2004 19:47, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 11:11, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > > 0x57 == 87 bytes is too big for inline.
> > 
> > Ugh.  So the only fix is not to inline it?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> You can make it conditionally inline/non-inline
> depending on SMP/preempt if you feel masochistic today :),
> but last time I asked davem thought that it is over the top.
I agree, not worth the trouble.  This would actually depend only on
PREEMPT and not SMP.
OK, third try.
Signed-Off-By: Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--- include/linux/netdevice.h~	2004-10-20 15:51:00.000000000 -0400
+++ include/linux/netdevice.h	2004-10-20 15:51:54.000000000 -0400
@@ -694,11 +694,14 @@
 /* Post buffer to the network code from _non interrupt_ context.
  * see net/core/dev.c for netif_rx description.
  */
-static inline int netif_rx_ni(struct sk_buff *skb)
+static int netif_rx_ni(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-       int err = netif_rx(skb);
+       int err;
+       preempt_disable();
+       err = netif_rx(skb);
        if (softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()))
                do_softirq();
+       preempt_enable();
        return err;
 }
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/