Re: BK kernel workflow

[Matthias Urlichs]

Hi,

Jeff Garzik:
> Wrong on all counts.
> 
I stand corrected.

> The right answer is, "bk-netdev conflicts with some other BK tree that's 
> also not yet in upstream"
> 
That sounds somewhat painful.

Personally I'd do the BK tree integration in a somewhat more
Bitkeeper-ish way, but that's (obviously) Andrew's call.

-- 
Matthias Urlichs   |   {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de   |  smurf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature