James Cloos <cloos@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"David" == David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
David> http://www.ozlabs.org/people/dgibson/maptest.tar.gz
David> On a number of machines I've tested - both ppc64 and x86 - the
David> SHARED version is consistently and significantly (50-100%)
David> slower than the PRIVATE version.
Just gave it a test on my laptop and server. Both are p3. The
laptop is under heavier mem pressure; the server has just under
a gig with most free/cache/buff. Laptop is still running 2.6.7
whereas the server is bk as of 2004-10-24.
Buth took about 11 seconds for the private and around 30 seconds
for the shared tests.
I get the exact opposite, on a P4:
vmm:/home/akpm/maptest> time ./mm-sharemmap ./mm-sharemmap 10.81s user 0.05s system 100% cpu 10.855 total
vmm:/home/akpm/maptest> time ./mm-sharemmap
./mm-sharemmap 11.04s user 0.05s system 100% cpu 11.086 total
vmm:/home/akpm/maptest> time ./mm-privmmap ./mm-privmmap 26.91s user 0.02s system 100% cpu 26.903 total
vmm:/home/akpm/maptest> time ./mm-privmmap
./mm-privmmap 26.89s user 0.02s system 100% cpu 26.894 total
vmm:/home/akpm/maptest> uname -a
Linux vmm 2.6.10-rc1-mm1 #14 SMP Tue Oct 26 23:23:23 PDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
It's all user time so I can think of no reason apart from physical page
allocation order causing additional TLB reloads in one case. One is using
anonymous pages and the other is using shmem-backed pages, although I can't
think why that would make a difference.