Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 7/7] uml: resolve symbols in back-traces

[Blaisorblade]

On Thursday 28 October 2004 22:51, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 05:32:43PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > They're not completely pointless, they just cater to an individual's
> > development environment, and that sort of stuff should be in the
> > environment, and not the code.
>
> unnecessary in the code then, the exception to this perhaps being the
> compile-command stuff that was (still is?) in some of the network
> drivers as that really is per-file state
??? I don't understand you well. If there are compile-commands for emacs, 
they're broken too - using make namefile.o ARCH=um is the kernel universal 
solution.
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/