Re: [PATCH] Configurable Magic Sysrq

[Måns Rullgård]

Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>    I know about a few people who would like to use some functionality of
>>  the Magic Sysrq but don't want to enable all the functions it provides.
>
> That's a new one.  Can you tell us more about why people want to do such a
> thing?
>
>>  So I wrote a patch which should allow them to do so. It allows to
>>  configure available functions of Sysrq via /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq (the
>>  interface is backward compatible). If you think it's useful then use it :)
>>  Andrew, do you think it can go into mainline or it's just an overdesign?
>
> Patch looks reasonable - we just need to decide whether the requirement
> warrants its inclusion.
>
> There have been a few changes in the sysrq code since 2.6.9 and there are
> more changes queued up in -mm.  The patch applies OK, but it'll need
> checking and redoing.  There's a new `sysrq-f' command in the pipeline
> which causes a manual oom-killer call.

See also the patch I just posted to lkml.

I also thought of an improved way of selecting keys to enable.
Instead of an arbitrary bitmask, would it be possible to simply list
the keys you want to enable, such as "echo sku > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq"?

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mru@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/