Re: status of DRM_MGA on x86_64

[Thomas Zehetbauer]

On Fre, 2004-10-29 at 12:47 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> The problem, which exists with most (all?) DRM drivers, is that data 
> types are used in the kernel/user interface that have different sizes on 
> LP32 and LP64.  If your kernel is 64-bit, you will have problems with 
> 32-bit applications.

Then either all or no DRM drivers should be enabled on x86_64, the
DRM_TDFX, DRM_R128, DRM_RADEON and DRM_SIS are not currently disabled. I
vote for enabling all drivers that work with 64-bit applications.

I wonder if this should be the first and only place where different
kernel/userland bitness causes problems. How has this been solved
elsewhere?

Tom

-- 
  T h o m a s   Z e h e t b a u e r   ( TZ251 )
  PGP encrypted mail preferred - KeyID 96FFCB89
      finger thomasz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx for key

Chemists don't die, they just stop to react.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part