Re: Mem issues in 2.6.9 (ever since 2.6.9-rc3) and possible cause

From: Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
Date: Sat Oct 30 2004 - 04:48:57 EST


Chris Ross wrote:



Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA escreveu:

zone->free_area[order]->nr_free is corrupted, this patch fix it.

It looks there is no area->nr_free++ code during freeing pages, now.


It's corrupt because area is out of scope at that point - it's declared within the for loop above.

Should I move your fix into the loop or move the declaration of area to function scope?

Oh, Okay, my patch was wrong ;(.
Very sorry for wrong hack.
This one will be Okay.

Sorry,
Kame <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-

linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm2-kamezawa/mm/page_alloc.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff -puN mm/page_alloc.c~cleanup2 mm/page_alloc.c
--- linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm2/mm/page_alloc.c~cleanup2 2004-10-30 18:40:19.024529640 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm2-kamezawa/mm/page_alloc.c 2004-10-30 18:40:40.225306632 +0900
@@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ static inline void __free_pages_bulk (st
coalesced = base + page_idx;
set_page_order(coalesced, order);
list_add(&coalesced->lru, &zone->free_area[order].free_list);
+ zone->free_area[order].nr_free++;
}

static inline void free_pages_check(const char *function, struct page *page)

_

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/