Re: sparse segfaults

[Duncan Sands]

> I suspect (but don't have any real argument to back that up) is that the
> gcc "extended lvalues" fell out as a side effect from how gcc ended up
> doing some random semantic tree parsing, and it wasn't really "designed"
> per se, as much as just a random implementation detail. Then somebody 
> noticed it, and said "cool" and documented it.

Generalized lvalues have been removed.  Check out
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/msg00604.html

All the best,

Duncan.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/