Re: [PATCH] cosa.h ioctl numbers

[Andreas Schwab]

Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Andreas Schwab wrote:
> : If you want real compatibility you should use size_t, which is what 2.4 is
> : effectively using.
> : 
> 	I assume that sizeof(struct .. *) == sizeof(size_t) on i386.

This has nothing to do with this, but everything to do with
sizeof(sizeof(foo)) == sizeof(size_t).  And COSAIODOWNLD does not expect a
pointer to a pointer but a pointer to struct cosa_download, which means
that _IOW('C',0xf2,struct cosa_download *) would be completely wrong
anyway.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@xxxxxxx
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/