Re: software suspend patch [1/6]
From: Guido Guenther
Date: Thu Dec 02 2004 - 16:14:41 EST
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 06:11:06PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > device-tree.diff
> > > base from suspend2 with a little changed.
> > >
> > > core.diff
> > > 1: redefine struct pbe for using _no_ continuous as pagedir.
> > > 2: make shrink memory as little as possible.
> > > 3: using a bitmap speed up collide check in page relocating.
> > > 4: pagecache saving ready.
> > >
> > > i386.diff
> > > ppc.diff
> > > i386 and powerpc suspend update.
> > >
> > > pagecachs_addon.diff
> > > if enable page caches saving, must using it, it making saving
> > > pagecaches safe. idea from suspend2.
> > >
> > > ppcfix.diff
> > > fix compile error.
> > > $ gcc -v
> > > ....
> > > gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)
> > >
> > > I'm using 2.6.9-ck3 With above patch, swsusp1 works prefect in my
> > > PowerPC and x86 PC with Highmem and prepempt option enabled.
> > >
> > > I hope the core.diff@1,@2,@3 i386.diff ppc.diff will merge into
> > > mainline kernel ASAP, :). from I view point device-tree.diff is
> > > very usefuly when using pagecache saving and pagecachs_addon.diff
> > > that's really hack for making pagecache saving safe.
> > >
> >
> > --- 2.6.9-lzf/arch/ppc/syslib/open_pic.c 2004-11-26 12:32:58.000000000 +0800
> > +++ 2.6.9/arch/ppc/syslib/open_pic.c 2004-11-28 23:16:58.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -776,7 +776,8 @@ static void openpic_mapirq(u_int irq, cp
> > if (ISR[irq] == 0)
> > return;
> > if (!cpus_empty(keepmask)) {
> > - cpumask_t irqdest = { .bits[0] = openpic_read(&ISR[irq]->Destination) };
> > + cpumask_t irqdest;
> > + irqdest.bits[0] = openpic_read(&ISR[irq]->Destination);
> > cpus_and(irqdest, irqdest, keepmask);
> > cpus_or(physmask, physmask, irqdest);
> > }
Doesn't the former mean initialize irqdest.bits as a whole to zero and
.bits[0] to openpic_read(...), while the later only sets
iqdest.bits[0] to openpic_read(...)?
I think this is wrong.
Cheers,
-- Guido
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/