Re: [PATCH] oom killer (Core)
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Fri Dec 03 2004 - 17:53:17 EST
Ooops, sorry it did add something to the Log after 10 minutes
On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 23:37 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> You're right. oom-kill() did not do anything wrong. See log below
>
> This is w/o PREEMPT. Is it neccecary to verify w/ PREEMPT too ?
>
> If it would have booted it still would have killed sshd instead of the
> application which was forking a lot of childs.
>
> Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
> Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
>
> END OF LOG
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
0000000c
printing eip:
c011fe30
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1]
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0
EIP: 0060:[<c011fe30>] Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010082 (2.6.10-rc2)
EIP is at __queue_work+0x20/0x60
eax: 00000000 ebx: c032cc80 ecx: 00000000 edx: 00000008
esi: c03acd14 edi: 00000282 ebp: c035ff64 esp: c035ff34
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo=c035e000 task=c02ebb00)
Stack: c035ffa4 00000000 c03acd14 c035ff64 c011fe99 00000000 c032cc80
c01dd8b0
c0119c20 00000000 00000000 c035ffa4 c035ff64 c035ff64 00000000
00000001
c03a5868 0000000a 003d9007 c0115f3b c03a5868 00000046 00099100
c039e120
Call Trace:
[<c011fe99>] queue_work+0x29/0x50
[<c01dd8b0>] blank_screen_t+0x0/0x20
[<c0119c20>] run_timer_softirq+0xb0/0x170
[<c0115f3b>] __do_softirq+0x7b/0x90
[<c0115f77>] do_softirq+0x27/0x30
[<c010411e>] do_IRQ+0x1e/0x30
[<c010271e>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
[<c0100623>] default_idle+0x23/0x40
[<c01006b4>] cpu_idle+0x34/0x40
[<c03607d8>] start_kernel+0x168/0x1b0
[<c0360370>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x1e0
Code: eb e5 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 83 ec 10 8b 44 24 14 89 5c 24 04
8b 5c 2
<0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/