Re: [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #2

[Robert Love]

> The reason I proposed my ideas for tying the two values together is 
> that I am
> concerned about breaking existing code.  

Nothing should break.

If apps don't explicitly set their i/o priority, then they get the
default.  Not a big deal.

This allows the default case to be the same as today.

	Robert Love


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/