Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm3-V0.7.32-6

[Lee Revell]

On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 10:07 -0600, K.R. Foley wrote:
> I am still confused about one thing, unrelated to this. If RT tasks 
> never expire and thus are never moved to the expired array??? Does that 
> imply that we never switch the active and expired arrays? If so how do 
> tasks that do expire get moved back into the active array?

I think that RT tasks use a completely different scheduling mechanism
that bypasses the active/expired array.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/