Re: page fault scalability patch V12: rss tasklist vs sloppy rss
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Thu Dec 09 2004 - 18:08:53 EST
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Unless the algorithms being compared are properly implemented, they're
> straw men, not valid comparisons.
Sloppy rss left the rss in the section of mm that contained the counters.
So that has a separate cacheline. The idea of putting the atomic ops in a
group was to only have one exclusive cacheline for mmap_sem and the rss.
Which could lead to more bouncing of a single cache line rather than
bouncing multiple cache lines less. But it seems to me that the problem
essentially remains the same if the rss counter is not split.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/