Re: IDE: strange WAIT_READY dependency on APM

[Alan Cox]

On Iau, 2004-12-09 at 03:44, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The time for the !APM case was already increased from 30msec in 2.4 .
> Isn't there a timeout that is suitable for all cases?

The five seconds should be just fine for all cases. The smaller value
with no
power manglement should help speed up recovery however. It probably
doesn't belong CONFIG_APM now ACPI and friends are involved either.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/