Re: RCU question
From: Zwane Mwaikambo
Date: Fri Dec 10 2004 - 18:01:41 EST
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, George Anzinger wrote:
> > Well, softirqs should really be preemptible if you care about RT task
> > latency. Ingo's patches have had this for months. Works great. Maybe
> > it's time to push it upstream.
>
> Yes, I understand, and soft_irq() does turn on interrupts...
> I was thinking of something like:
>
> while(softirq_pending()) {
> local_irq_enable();
> do_softirq();
> local_irq_disable();
> }
> <proceed to idle hlt...>
But that's a deadlock and if you enable interrupts you race.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/