Re: [RFC] pid randomness

From: Jan Engelhardt
Date: Mon Dec 27 2004 - 14:55:13 EST

Next message: Jan Engelhardt: "Re: Cannot compile without sysctl (+semi-patch)"
Previous message: Tymm Twillman: "2.4, 2.6, i686/athlon and LDT's"
In reply to: Pedro Venda (SYSADM): "[RFC] pid randomness"
Next in thread: Pedro Venda (SYSADM): "Re: [RFC] pid randomness"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I don't know if this has been discussed before... but I'd like to ask why isn't
> the pids randomized by default?
> What are the pros and cons of this? What are your oppinions on this subjet?

Why would _you_ need it?

Jan Engelhardt
--
ENOSPC
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jan Engelhardt: "Re: Cannot compile without sysctl (+semi-patch)"
Previous message: Tymm Twillman: "2.4, 2.6, i686/athlon and LDT's"
In reply to: Pedro Venda (SYSADM): "[RFC] pid randomness"
Next in thread: Pedro Venda (SYSADM): "Re: [RFC] pid randomness"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]