Re: PATCH: kmalloc packet slab
From: Valdis . Kletnieks
Date: Mon Dec 27 2004 - 17:56:12 EST
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 14:23:50 PST, "David S. Miller" said:
> If we are really going to do something like this, it should
> be calculated properly and be determined per-interface
> type as netdevs are registered.
Would you prefer to see this done for all interface types if we do it
at all, or would a special-case for 1 or 2 types that can use a slab
without being wasteful be an acceptable solution? (Let's face it - if
3.95 objects fit in each slab, we may not want to do it...)
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature