Re: [PATCH] fix conflicting cpu_idle() declarations

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:55:16AM +0900, Hirokazu Takata wrote:
> I think it is OK for m32r.
> BTW, you moved the definition of cpu_idle() to smp.h.
> It may not be included from arch/*/process.c in some archs.
> Is it OK?

It should be okay to include even on UP-only arches, IIRC it has stubs
for UP versions of various locking primitives etc. used widely
throughout the kernel.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/