Re: [PATCH 1/2 2.6.10] rcu: simplify quiescent state detection

[Oleg Nesterov]

Manfred Spraul wrote:
> 
> No, it's not needed. Actually: not even a counter is needed, just
> a flag that indicates that there was a quiescent state.
> 

Yes, this patch is obviously better.

Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/