Re: [PATCH] rcu: speed up quiescent state detection

[Oleg Nesterov]

Manfred Spraul wrote:
> 
> one timer tick, without changing the approach. I'm still thinking about
> the design change I proposed: In each quiescent state: check if there is
> a running grace period and if there is one, then mark the current cpu as
> done.
> 

I must admit, i have misunderstood your patch after the first reading.
Now i think your idea is better.

Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/