Re: [PATCH] zap the ACPI shutdown bug (was Re: Reviving the conceptof a stable series)
From: Bill Davidsen
Date: Thu Jan 06 2005 - 16:26:20 EST
Barry K. Nathan wrote:
If the "backport" jokes don't make sense yet, consider this dilemma: If
a backported patch has not been committed upstream yet, then is it
really a backport?
If a patch is against a later base and is rediffed to be against an
earlier base, hopefully with side effects controlled, I think it's
reasonable to call it a backport.
--
-bill davidsen (davidsen@xxxxxxx)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/