Re: [PATCH] i386/x86-64: Fix timer SMP bootup race
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Sat Jan 15 2005 - 02:21:04 EST
> I don't get it. By the time the secondaries enter the idle loop, they've
> already run init_timers_cpu() anyway. You patch doesn't address a
The notifier uns only after smp_prepare_cpus and then all the synchronization
is long done.
> secondary taking a timer interrupt prior to the BP having run
> init_timers(), does it?
It initializes the timer of a CPU before it is even touched.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/