Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:--- linux-2.6.11-mm1/drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c.orig 2005-01-17 20:42:40.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-mm1/drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c 2005-01-17 20:43:14.000000000 +0100
@@ -197,9 +197,7 @@ static int verify_command(struct file *f
if (type & CMD_WRITE_SAFE) {
if (file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)
return 0;
- }
-
- if (!(type & CMD_WARNED)) {
+ } else if (!(type & CMD_WARNED)) {
cmd_type[cmd[0]] = CMD_WARNED;
printk(KERN_WARNING "scsi: unknown opcode 0x%02x\n", cmd[0]);
}
That patch will not write the warning message in some cases.
I think this patch is better:-
---
linux-petero/drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c~scsi-filter drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c
--- linux/drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c~scsi-filter 2005-01-18 23:38:37.966026728 +0100
+++ linux-petero/drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c 2005-01-18 23:38:37.970026120 +0100
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static int verify_command(struct file *f
}
if (!(type & CMD_WARNED)) {
- cmd_type[cmd[0]] = CMD_WARNED;
+ cmd_type[cmd[0]] |= CMD_WARNED;
printk(KERN_WARNING "scsi: unknown opcode 0x%02x\n", cmd[0]);
}
_