Hi Hannes,Sure. And we don't need a special HWDEV variable, as there is already a PHYSDEVPATH variable providing exactly this information.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:59:30 +0100, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
But the real question is whether we really need class devices have
unique names or we could do with inputX thus leaving individual
drivers intact and only modifying the input core. As far as I
understand userspace should be concerned only with device
capabilities, not particular name, besides, it gets PRODUCT string
which has all needed data encoded.
Indeed. What about using 'phys' (with all '/' replaced by '-') as the
class_id? This way we'll retain compability with /proc/bus/input/devices
and do not have to touch every single driver.
I want to kill phys at some point - we have topology information
already present in sysfs in much better form. Can we have a new
hotplug variable HWDEV= which is kobject_path(input_dev->dev). If
input_dev is not set then we can just dump phys in it. And the class
id will still be inputX. Will this work?
Btw, I really doubt that topology information is important here as theYes, topology is not an issue when loading modules.
only thing that one needs to do when new "input_device" appears is to
load one or more input handler modules based on device's capability
bits. The decision whether a device is "good enough" to create a
device node should be done by hotplug handler for the other "input"
class.