Re: 2.6.10-mm1 hang

[Robert Love]

On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 17:01 -0500, linux-os wrote:

> What would you expect this to do? After the first lock is
> obtained, the second MUST fail forever or else the spin-lock
> doesn't work. The code, above, just proves that spin-locks
> work!

He has a four processor machine.  Since the lock is local, it is
somewhat odd that the other three lock up.

	Robert Love


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/