Re: [PATCH] relayfs redux for 2.6.10: lean and mean

[Peter Williams]

Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:15:28PM +1100, Peter Williams wrote:
>
> > Perhaps the logical solution is to implement debugfs in terms of relayfs?
>
>
> What do you mean by this statement?

I mean that if, as you say, debugfs is very similar to relayfs only more 
restricted (i.e. a debugging option) then it should be implementable as 
an instance or specialization of the more general relayfs and that this 
should be a better solution than two independent implementations of 
similar functionality.

Peter
--
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
 -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/