Re: [PATCH]sched: Isochronous class v2 for unprivileged soft rt scheduling

[Ingo Molnar]

* Jack O'Quin <joq@xxxxxx> wrote:

> I finally made new kernel builds for the latest patches from both Ingo
> and Con.  I kept the two patch sets separate, as they modify some of
> the same files.
> 
> I ran three sets of tests with three or more 5 minute runs for each
> case.  The results (log files and graphs) are in these directories...
> 
>   1) sched-fifo -- as a baseline
>      http://www.joq.us/jack/benchmarks/sched-fifo
> 
>   2) sched-iso -- Con's scheduler, no privileges
>      http://www.joq.us/jack/benchmarks/sched-iso
> 
>   3) nice-20 -- Ingo's "nice --20" scheduler hack
>      http://www.joq.us/jack/benchmarks/nice-20

thanks for the testing. The important result is that nice--20
performance is roughly the same as SCHED_ISO. This somewhat
reduces the urgency of the introduction of SCHED_ISO.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/