Re: [PATCH]sched: Isochronous class v2 for unprivileged soft rt scheduling

[Nick Piggin]

Jack O'Quin wrote:

> Chris Wright and Arjan van de Ven have outlined a proposal to address
> the privilege issue using rlimits.  This is still the only workable
> alternative to the realtime LSM on the table.  If the decision were up
> to me, I would choose the simplicity and better security of the LSM.
> But their approach is adequate, if implemented in a timely fashion.  I
> would like to see some progress on this in addition to the scheduler
> work.  People still need SCHED_FIFO for some applications.

I think this is a pretty sane and minimally intrusive (for the kernel)
way to support what you want.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/