Re: [PATCH][SELINUX] Fix selinux_inode_setattr hook

[Chris Wright]

* Stephen Smalley (sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 13:14, Chris Wright wrote:
> > * Stephen Smalley (sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > > This patch against 2.6.11-rc3 fixes the selinux_inode_setattr hook
> > > function to honor the ATTR_FORCE flag, skipping any permission checking
> > > in that case.  Otherwise, it is possible though unlikely for a denial
> > > from the hook to prevent proper updating, e.g. for remove_suid upon
> > > writing to a file.  This would only occur if the process had write
> > > permission to a suid file but lacked setattr permission to it.  Please
> > > apply.
> > 
> > Is there any reason not to promote this to the framework?
> 
> I wasn't sure if a security module might still want to be notified of
> forced changes (e.g. to adjust some state in its own security
> structure), even if it skips permission checking on such changes.

OK, let's go with your patch for now.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/