Daniel Drake <dsd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
# fs/binfmt_elf.c
# 2005/01/17 13:37:56-08:00 ecd@xxxxxxxxx +43 -19
# [SPARC64]: Missing user access return value checks in fs/binfmt_elf.c and fs/compat.c
#
I think so. For a short period we applied this patch to the Gentoo 2.6.10
kernel...
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/gentoo-dev-sources/release-10.01/dist/1900_umem_catch.patch
...but removed it once users complained it stopped kylix binaries from running.
Bah. That's what happens when you fix stuff.
What's kylix? The Borland C++ builder thing?
How should one set about reproducing this problem?