Re: [patch 10/13] Solaris nfsacl workaround

[Olivier Galibert]

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 05:43:24PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> ty den 15.02.2005 Klokka 21:35 (+0100) skreiv Olivier Galibert:
> > That's the second time I see you refusing an interoperability patch
> > without bothering to say what would be acceptable.  Do we need a fork
> > between knfsd-pure and knfsd-actually-works-in-the-real-world or what?
> 
> You appear to be under the misguided impression that if a patch is
> reviewed, and rejected, then somehow the responsibility for resolving
> your problem (and cleaning up the code) falls to the reviewer.
> 
> I'm not aware of any such rule.

Resolving the problem and/or cleaning the code, no.  Telling what kind
of patch would be acceptable is your responsability, yes.  That's
where the difference is between a reviewer and a naysayer.

  OG.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/