Re: [PATCH] New operation for kref to help avoid locks

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:02:43PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 12:15 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 04:23:04PM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
> > > Add a routine to kref that allows the kref_put() routine to be
> > > unserialized even when the get routine attempts to kref_get()
> > > an object without first holding a valid reference to it.  This is
> > > useful in situations where this happens multiple times without
> > > freeing the object, as it will avoid having to do a lock/semaphore
> > > except on the final kref_put().
> > > 
> > > This also adds some kref documentation to the Documentation
> > > directory.
> > 
> > I like the first part of the documentation, that's nice.
> > 
> > But I don't like the new kref_get_with_check() function that you
> > implemented.  If you look in the -mm tree, kref_put() now returns if
> > this was the last put on the reference count or not, to help with lists
> > of objects with a kref in it.
> > 
> > Perhaps you can use that to implement what you need instead?
> 
> note that I'm not convinced the "lockless" implementation actually is
> faster. It still uses an atomic variable, which is just as expensive as
> taking a lock normally...

I have never stated it would be "faster" that I know of, and you still
need a lock to protect some of the paths.  But that is documented in my
2004 ols paper about kref.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/