Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 03:28:22AM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> 
> Greg> So, while I like the _idea_ of the 2.6.x.y type releases, having
> Greg> those releases contain anything but a handful of patches will
> Greg> quickly get quite messy.
> 
> Wouldn't this actually happen automatically simply by Linus switching
> to being a lot more picky about whats accepted into an even release. I
> agree that if it becomes too formal it could probably turn into an
> unmaintainable mess. However, by simply making it a golden rule, then
> developers can just continue pushing their patches and the people
> above can just shift things to -mm that aren't deemed suitable for the
> even release.
> 
> I think this would work quite well.

Sure, but the point about people not testing the odd release would still
stand.  As it is today, we've been pretty good about only allowing
bugfixes into the later -rc releases.  But I know I start queuing
"bigger" fixes at that point in time, allowing them to get more testing
in -mm release, and generally trying to be conserative.  

And sometimes, people really want those "big" fixes, and they switch to
using the bk-usb patchset, or the bk-scsi patchset.  That happens a lot
for when distros work to stabilize their release kernels.  But that is
quite different from trying to do that for a 2.6.x.y release.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/