Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering

[Anton Altaparmakov]

On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > I think the .EVEN and .ODD proposal would work a lot better than -rc ever
> > would/could.
> 
> ...until people find out the "secret" that .ODD is really beta.  Then we are
> back where we started.

Ah, but you are assuming people think logically and they don't.  "2.6.ODD 
doesn't say beta so it can't be beta, right?"  I think this directly 
translates to the actually happening "0.x is not 1.x so it can't be 
usable, right?"  Both statements are crap but the second is real world and 
the first by analogy could be real world.

Best regards,

	Anton
-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/