Re: [-mm patch] seccomp: don't say it was more or less mandatory

[Andrew Morton]

Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> My point is simply:
> 
>  The help text for an option you need only under very specific 
>  circumstances shouldn't sound as if this option was nearly was 
>  mandatory.

I think the sort of sell-your-cycles service which this patch enables is a
neat idea, and one which is worth supporting, especially as the kernel
patch is so tiny.  So we want as many machines as possible to support it. 
So people don't need a special kernel just to join in.

Others may disagree, although nobody has.

And the patch is tiny.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/