Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated

[Jeff Garzik]

Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:10:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:09:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:43:59PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Patch:
> > > > > > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/2.6.11-rc5-bk4-libata-dev1.patch.bz2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Still not usable here.  The same errors as before when backing up:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please try 2.6.11 without any patches.
> > > > >
> > > > > Plain 2.6.11 doesn't work either.  All of 2.6.10-ac11, 2.6.11-rc5,
> > > > > 2.6.11-rc5 + 2.6.11-rc5-bk4-libata-dev1.patch and 2.6.11 fail with the
> > > > > same symptoms. 
> > > > >
> > > > > Reverting to stable 2.6.10-ac8 :-)
> > > >
> > > > Does reverting the attached patch in 2.6.11 (apply with patch -R) fix 
> > > > things?
> > >
> > >
> > > Still the same with this patch reverted.
> >
> > Does reverting the attached patch in 2.6.11 fix things?  (apply with 
> > patch -R)
> >
> > This patch reverts the entire libata back to 2.6.10.
>
> I'm confused.  Still the same with everything reverted.  What shall I do
> now?

Well, first, thanks for your patience in narrowing this down.

This means we have eliminated libata as a problem source, but we still 
have the rest of the kernel go to through :)

Try disabling ACPI with 'acpi=off' or 'pci=biosirq' to see if that fixes 
things.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/