Re: Linux 2.6.11.1

[Dave Jones]

On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:28:02PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
 > 
 > 
 > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Greg KH wrote:
 > 
 > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:36:14PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > > > But we end up with a cset in the permanent kernel history which simply
 > > > should not have been there.
 > > 
 > > Is this really a big deal?
 > 
 > Once? No. If it ends up being "par for the course", it's bad.

The amount of stuff in the sucker tree shouldn't really amount
to /that/ many patches should it ? If it does, then 2.6.x is in
worse shape than we've all been admitting.

Would it be that much work to just send the 'meat' as gnu patches,
and leave the not-for-linus stuff alone ?

		Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/