Re: [PATCH] EFI missing failure handling

[Matt Domsch]

On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:17:34PM +0100, Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 07:06:29PM +0200 or thereabouts, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 March 2005 17:38, Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
> > 
> > > The EFI driver allocates memory and writes into it without checking the
> > > success of the allocation:
> > > 
> > > 668     efi_char16_t *variable_name = kmalloc(1024, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > ...
> > > 696     memset(variable_name, 0, 1024);
> > 
> > > --- linux-2.6.11-orig/drivers/firmware/efivars.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6.11-pi/drivers/firmware/efivars.c
> > > @@ -670,6 +670,9 @@ efivars_init(void)
> > 
> > > +	if (!variable_name)
> > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > >  	if (!efi_enabled)
> > >  		return -ENODEV; 
> > 
> > I'd better move kmalloc() and checking for success down right before
> > memset(). Otherwise you leak if efi_enabled == 0.
> > Oh, and efivars_init() wants to return "error", not unconditionally 0.
> > 
> > 	Alexey
> 
> Thanks! How about the updated patch?

Looks good to me.  Good catch, and thanks for the patch!  Please
forward to Andrew Morton (akpm@xxxxxxxx) directly, following the
format described here: http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html

Thanks,
Matt

-- 
Matt Domsch
Software Architect
Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/